about
Our Editorial Standards
By Matt Hall, Founder and independent researcher
Written July 5, 2026Last updated July 5, 2026How we review
These are the rules we hold every page to. They exist so you can trust what you read here, and so you can hold us to account when we fall short.
Sourcing
- Health claims are tied to published, peer-reviewed research. We link to the source (PubMed, Cochrane, or the journal) so you can check it yourself.
- We grade evidence honestly as strong, moderate, or limited, and we say when the research is thin or mixed rather than rounding up.
- We are precise about regulation: FDA-cleared, FDA-registered, and FDA-approved are different, and we do not blur them.
- Prices and specs are verified against the manufacturer's own current pages, and dated, because they change.
Claims we refuse to make
- We never say a device diagnoses, treats, cures, or prevents any disease, except where a specific device documents its own FDA clearance for that use.
- We do not present individual testimonials as proof that a device works, and we do not publish anonymous or fabricated testimonials.
- We do not use false urgency or scarcity.
Accuracy and corrections
We check facts before we publish. When we get something wrong, we fix it and note what changed and when. Every article shows a written date and a last-updated date so you can see how current it is.
If you spot an error, a broken link, or a claim that is not supported, tell us. We take it seriously and we respond.
Human-written
Our content is written and edited by people. We use research tools, but we do not publish machine-generated articles as if a person wrote and stood behind them.